Taxpayers in Pakistan who are waiting for refunds from the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) often face delays that extend well beyond statutory timelines. To address this issue and protect taxpayer rights, Section 171 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 provides a legal mechanism for compensation in cases where refunds are not paid on time. As tax year 2026 approaches, understanding how this provision works is increasingly important for individuals and businesses alike.
Under Section 171, the law clearly states that if a tax refund is not issued within three months from the date it becomes due, the Commissioner is required to pay additional compensation to the taxpayer. This compensation is not discretionary; it is a statutory obligation intended to discourage delays and ensure fairness in the tax administration process. The additional amount is calculated at a rate equal to the Karachi Interbank Offered Rate (KIBOR) plus 0.5 percent per annum, applied to the refund amount.
The compensation period begins after the expiry of the initial three-month window and continues until the date the refund is actually paid. This means that the longer the delay, the higher the compensation payable, creating a financial incentive for timely processing of refunds. For taxpayers, this provision serves as both a safeguard and a measurable right that can be monitored and, where necessary, claimed.
However, the law also allows for certain exceptions. If the FBR believes that a refund claim is invalid or requires further verification, the payment of compensation may be suspended while the matter is under investigation. In such cases, the additional amount does not accrue during the investigation period. Once the inquiry is concluded and the refund is confirmed as valid, the compensation mechanism resumes in accordance with the law.
A key aspect of Section 171 is determining when a refund is considered “due,” as this date directly affects the calculation of compensation. The ordinance outlines specific scenarios to clarify this point. Where a refund arises as a result of an appellate order from the Commissioner (Appeals), Appellate Tribunal, High Court, or Supreme Court, the refund becomes due on the date the Commissioner receives the relevant order. In cases where the refund is generated due to a revision order under Section 122A, it becomes due on the date that order is issued.
For all other situations, the refund is considered due on the date the refund order itself is made. Importantly, for refunds covered under Section 170, the compensation under Section 171 is calculated from the refund order date rather than the date of assessment under Section 120. This distinction is critical for taxpayers calculating potential compensation and tracking timelines accurately.
The practical implication of Section 171 is that taxpayers have a clear right to compensation when refunds are delayed beyond three months. The formula is straightforward: the refund amount multiplied by the applicable annual rate of KIBOR plus 0.5 percent, adjusted for the duration of the delay. By understanding this mechanism, taxpayers can better hold the tax authorities accountable and ensure transparency in the refund process.
Overall, Section 171 plays an important role in balancing the relationship between taxpayers and the FBR. It reinforces the principle that delays carry a cost and that timely refunds are not merely an administrative courtesy but a legal obligation. For tax year 2026, staying informed about refund timelines and compensation rules can help taxpayers safeguard their financial interests.
Follow the PakBanker Whatsapp Channel for updates across Pakistan’s banking ecosystem.