The ongoing geopolitical conflict in the Middle East has cast uncertainty over Pakistan’s ongoing negotiations with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), potentially delaying the third mandatory review of the country’s $7 billion Extended Fund Facility (EFF) programme. The development comes as global economic conditions shift rapidly due to the conflict, forcing the IMF to reassess macroeconomic projections that were previously used to evaluate programme performance.
According to emerging reports, the Fund’s review process has slowed as economists reassess global and country-specific projections affected by disruptions in energy markets, trade flows, and financial stability. The IMF had already acknowledged early signs of economic disturbance shortly after the conflict began. In a press release issued on March 3, the Fund noted that the situation had triggered disruptions to trade and economic activity, sharp increases in energy prices, and heightened volatility in global financial markets. These changes have prompted the institution to reconsider economic assumptions used for several countries, including Pakistan.
The IMF review process is a critical requirement under the EFF programme, which was approved to stabilize Pakistan’s fragile economy and support structural reforms. Successful completion of the review would pave the way for the next tranche of financial assistance under the programme. However, the changing global environment has made it necessary for IMF staff to reassess Pakistan’s economic outlook before finalizing the review.
An IMF delegation led by mission chief Nathan Porter’s team member Maria Petrova conducted virtual discussions with Pakistani authorities between February 25 and March 11. Following the talks, the Fund issued a statement indicating that meaningful progress had been made but that discussions would continue to evaluate the consequences of recent global developments. The IMF noted that negotiations were ongoing and that both sides would continue discussions with the objective of concluding them in the coming days.
Despite the delay, the IMF acknowledged progress in several areas tied to programme implementation. These include efforts to sustain fiscal consolidation aimed at strengthening public finances, maintaining a sufficiently tight monetary policy to ensure inflation remains within the State Bank of Pakistan’s target range, and advancing reforms to improve the long-term viability of the country’s energy sector. Structural reforms were also discussed extensively during the talks, particularly those aimed at improving economic growth prospects while expanding social protection and restoring public spending in sectors such as health and education.
However, the challenge lies in balancing these reform goals with Pakistan’s ambition to accelerate economic growth. Growth expansion generally requires looser monetary conditions, including potential reductions in the policy interest rate. The State Bank of Pakistan’s Monetary Policy Committee, however, decided on March 9 to keep the policy rate unchanged, a decision widely viewed as consistent with commitments made under the IMF programme to maintain tight monetary conditions until inflation stabilizes.
Fiscal policy is also likely to remain a sensitive topic in ongoing negotiations. The IMF traditionally emphasizes strict fiscal discipline, including adherence to full-cost recovery principles for public utilities and avoiding sector-specific subsidies or incentive packages. Some recently proposed government measures, such as a reduction in electricity tariffs by Rs4.04 per unit and a proposal to lower export refinance rates from 7.5 percent to 4.5 percent, could become points of discussion during the review process.
Concerns within Pakistan are growing that any prolonged delay in reaching a staff-level agreement with the IMF could affect the timing of the next disbursement under the programme. The release of these funds is considered important for maintaining balance-of-payments stability, particularly as the country continues to face external financing pressures.
Even before the escalation of conflict in the Middle East, Pakistan’s external sector indicators were showing signs of stress. The country’s trade deficit widened significantly during the first eight months of the current fiscal year, rising from $20.04 billion during July-February 2025 to $25.04 billion in the same period of the current fiscal cycle. While remittances from overseas workers had been increasing earlier in the year, analysts expect economic disruptions in Gulf economies caused by the conflict to potentially reduce remittance inflows in the coming months.
Foreign direct investment prospects may also face temporary setbacks. A significant portion of the investment commitments pledged to Pakistan in recent years through memoranda of understanding came from Gulf countries. If economic activity slows in those economies due to the ongoing conflict, the inflow of pledged investments could be delayed or reduced.
Given these uncertainties, economic observers suggest that Pakistani authorities must ensure strict compliance with programme conditions and structural benchmarks agreed with the IMF. Addressing any outstanding reform commitments promptly could help prevent delays linked to policy implementation and facilitate the conclusion of the ongoing review process.
As global geopolitical tensions continue to reshape energy markets and trade patterns, the IMF review process has become more complex. For Pakistan, timely completion of the review remains crucial to sustaining financial stability and maintaining confidence in its ongoing economic reform programme.
Follow the PakBanker Whatsapp Channel for updates across Pakistan’s banking ecosystem



