Pakistan’s Green Taxonomy Policy: A Step Towards Sustainable Finance, But Urgency is Key

The State Bank of Pakistan’s (SBP) decision to release the initial draft of its Green Taxonomy policy by the end of March 2025 is an important and long-awaited move. While this policy comes far later than needed for a nation ranked among the most vulnerable to climate change, it still signifies a crucial shift towards integrating sustainability into the country’s financial system. Better late than never, after all.

Pakistan’s vulnerability to climate risks is no longer a hypothetical concern. The nation is already grappling with the consequences of environmental neglect, from catastrophic floods to extreme temperatures and erratic weather patterns. These developments have made it clear that climate change is an existential threat, not just a distant worry. Despite this, the financial sector has been largely disengaged from climate resilience discussions and has made little effort to align investments with sustainability objectives.

The SBP’s move to introduce a Green Taxonomy—a system for categorizing economic activities based on their environmental sustainability—is a long overdue but welcome step. This taxonomy can provide clarity to the financial sector on which investments are aligned with environmental goals. By identifying projects that help mitigate environmental risks, the taxonomy could help direct capital to more sustainable industries, ensuring both transparency and accountability in the green finance space.

In theory, the Green Taxonomy could also unlock new opportunities for foreign investments. International institutions increasingly prioritize Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles, and if Pakistan aligns its financial system with these criteria, it could attract much-needed capital. Unfortunately, this potential has not been fully realized by Pakistan so far. The SBP’s recognition of the importance of sustainability in financial practices represents a hopeful shift toward changing that.

However, for this initiative to succeed, implementation will be key. The mere existence of a policy framework will not suffice. A comprehensive, globally aligned, and enforceable Green Taxonomy must be developed and implemented to ensure that it supports sustainable investments. The challenge lies in ensuring rigorous oversight and building mechanisms that make green financing not only possible but attractive. Pakistan has a history of policy failures due to weak enforcement and lack of political will. If this initiative is to make a real impact, it must be accompanied by strong governance and incentives that encourage the banking sector to adopt sustainability-focused strategies.

The SBP must also ensure that the Green Taxonomy doesn’t become just another bureaucratic obstacle. The private sector, which will be essential to driving this transition, needs clarity on compliance requirements and assurance that adopting green practices won’t come at the cost of economic growth. A balanced approach is needed—one that incentivizes industries to adopt greener methods rather than imposing punitive measures that could hinder businesses in an already challenging economic environment.

Timing is also a significant concern. The policy draft is just the beginning of what will likely be a lengthy process involving consultations, revisions, and eventual implementation. With Pakistan’s climate crisis worsening by the day, the SBP cannot afford delays. The framework must be operationalized quickly, and complementary policies—such as tax incentives for green projects and penalties for unsustainable practices—must be introduced alongside the taxonomy to ensure that it has the desired impact.

Finally, the success of this initiative will require collaboration beyond the financial sector. The SBP should engage with various government agencies, regulators, and industry players to ensure that the Green Taxonomy aligns with the country’s broader climate goals. The energy sector, for example, remains heavily reliant on fossil fuels, and a Green Taxonomy that overlooks financing mechanisms for transitioning to renewable energy would render the initiative ineffective.

While there are certainly hurdles ahead, the SBP deserves credit for finally addressing a crucial issue that has long been neglected by Pakistan’s financial authorities. Climate change is not just an environmental issue; it poses a significant economic and financial threat to the stability of the nation. If handled properly, the Green Taxonomy could be the catalyst for a fundamental shift toward sustainable finance in Pakistan—one that focuses on long-term resilience, sustainability, and economic stability.

Pakistan can no longer afford to treat green finance as a secondary concern. The SBP now has a responsibility to ensure that this Green Taxonomy is more than just a policy draft. It should serve as the foundation for reshaping the financial landscape into one that prioritizes sustainability and long-term economic security.